María Cantero-García
Lecturer in Psychology
The study is robust in terms of quality and data. The researchers have used rigorous methods to reach their conclusions.
This study challenges a widely accepted consensus in the therapeutic community that suppressing negative thoughts is harmful. While the idea that suppression is counterproductive has been dogma, this research suggests that the reality may be more nuanced, highlighting that it does not always lead to negative outcomes. This seems to be partly related to the approach taken by third-generation therapies, such as Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), Mindfulness-Based Therapy (MBCT) and Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT), which have particular approaches to thought suppression.
However, it is important to note some limitations. The study may not address all situations and nuances, and its findings may not apply uniformly to all individuals or therapeutic contexts. In addition, more research is needed to fully understand the implications of these results.
In terms of the impact on individuals undergoing psychotherapy, this study could provide therapists with a more balanced understanding of negative-thought suppression. It could offer additional tools to help people deal with their thoughts effectively, always taking into account the circumstances and context. However, it is essential that therapists continue to assess each situation individually and consider the limitations and complexity of this issue in their clinical practice.