Reacción a "The poorest regions in Europe have higher mortality rates from air pollution"

The study stands out for its high scientific quality and innovative approach, analysing nearly 89 million deaths across Europe and, for the first time, systematically combining socioeconomic factors, air pollution, and energy transition within a single analytical framework. Unlike previous studies, which usually focus solely on pollutant exposure, this work introduces a new dimension: the unequal vulnerability of populations and how it evolves over time in connection with the energy transition. Although it relies on models and has some limitations—such as the use of aggregated renewable energy data and methods that may smooth out local variations—its scale and integrated approach make it a highly robust reference.

The results reveal a two-speed Europe: poorer regions, particularly in the east and south, face a double burden, experiencing both higher exposure and greater mortality risk from pollution, while wealthier regions are progressing faster in reducing risks. This pattern aligns with previous evidence showing inequalities in pollution exposure. However, the study goes further by demonstrating that differences also exist in vulnerability and in the benefits derived from environmental improvements.

The main novelty is that the energy transition not only reduces pollution by cutting fossil fuel emissions but is also associated with lower vulnerability to pollution, partly linked to better socioeconomic and environmental conditions in regions further ahead in the transition. In other words, it is not just ‘less pollution’ but also less harm for the same level of exposure. This provides a more complete and realistic picture of how climate policies can translate into health benefits.

From a public policy perspective, the message is clear: the energy transition is not only an environmental issue but also one of equity and public health. The study suggests that policies should prioritise the most vulnerable regions, combining investment in renewable energy, air quality improvements, and strengthened healthcare systems. Otherwise, the transition could exacerbate existing inequalities. Integrating energy, environment, and health thus emerges as a key condition for a just and effective transition.

For Spain, these findings are particularly relevant. As a southern European country, it experiences frequent pollution episodes, especially from ozone, alongside territorial inequalities. The study suggests that advancing renewable energy can bring additional health benefits but also emphasises the need to complement it with specific public health policies, such as epidemiological monitoring, early warning systems for pollution episodes, enhanced healthcare for vulnerable populations, and coordination between environmental and health policies. In this context, the energy transition should not only be understood as a climate strategy but also as a crucial tool to reduce health inequalities and improve the population’s well-being.