África González-Fernández
Professor of Immunology at the University of Vigo, researcher at the Galicia Sur Research Institute (IIS-GS) and member of the RAFG
This is a very unfortunate measure, with many implications at various levels and which will affect us all.
On the one hand, it devalues the prestige of the World Health Organization at a global level, dragging other countries to do the same.
On the other hand, it will reduce the economic funds of this organization, which will reduce the important activities it carries out, especially in countries that need it most. Many diseases that are now under control (prevention, monitoring, therapies) will surely return with even greater force.
This decision therefore puts at risk the health and lives of many people, especially children, and especially in vulnerable areas where WHO's role is critical.
Already in the pandemic, Bloomberg Business Week magazine indicated whether we were ready for a next pandemic, and indicated a five-step plan:
1. Emerging Pathogen Control.
2. Increased power and control of WHO, being independent.
3. Tracking pathogens and variants.
4. Vaccines: with more companies, resolving the issue of patents.
5. Measures in logistics, coordination and planning.
Therefore, what should be done is to give much more weight to the WHO, who are the most expert in relation to health problems, infections, pandemics, vaccination, climate change, and who do a commendable job in many countries of the world.
If we want to achieve the One Health model, it will only be possible through an international organization concerned about health such as the WHO.