Review concludes that studies on the benefits of moderate drinking use biased methods

Studies associating the consumption of low amounts of alcohol with health benefits are not of good scientific quality, says a meta-analysis pooling the findings of 107 previous papers. For example, studies may use a reference group of older adults who have given up or limited alcohol for health reasons. Compared to those who continue to drink, the latter appear to be in better health, notes the article, published in the Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs.

25/07/2024 - 07:00 CEST
 
Expert reactions

Iñaki Galán - estudios alcohol EN

Iñaki Galán Labaca

Scientific researcher at the National Epidemiology Centre - Carlos III Institute of Health

 

Science Media Centre Spain

The message that low amounts of alcohol consumption can have beneficial effects on health status has been built on weak scientific evidence. This article addresses the multiple biases of observational cohort studies in the association between alcohol consumption and mortality, highlighting the use of non-drinkers as a reference category, which usually includes occasional drinkers and ex-drinkers.

It incorporates, with respect to previous works, a classification according to the control or not of multiple biases, differentiating according to the adjustment of each one of them, and generally separating them into low and high quality studies. The conclusion, following the review of 107 longitudinal studies, is the enormous variation in the results underpinning this message, noting that when selecting young cohorts and separating ex-drinkers and occasional drinkers from abstainers, the risk of mortality in consumers of low amounts of alcohol was very similar.

The methodological approach of the study is appropriate to its objectives. Among its strengths is that it is a recent systematic review of published cohort studies. Among its limitations, it might have been interesting to differentiate an analysis group for population-based cohort studies, which have less selection bias than cohorts based on convenience sampling.

The author has declared they have no conflicts of interest
EN
Publications
Why Do Only Some Cohort Studies Find Health Benefit From Low-Volume Alcohol Use? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Study Characteristics That May Bias Mortality Risk Estimates
  • Research article
  • Peer reviewed
  • Systematic review
  • Meta-analysis
Journal
Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
Publication date
Authors

Tim Stockwell et al.

Study types:
  • Research article
  • Peer reviewed
  • Systematic review
  • Meta-analysis
The 5Ws +1
Publish it
FAQ
Contact